This is a referendum whose proposer address (0x008f1eb2fe83609d4cd644110f7ce2c078816dbd4b0ba7e6b7152c25f2523756) is shown in on-chain info below. Only this user can edit this description and the title. If you own this account, login and tell us more about your proposal.

This referendum aims to reward high quality nomination pools using a fair evaluation system. The evaluation system looked at specific criteria such as metadata, verified identity and nominees. An open-source tool was used to analyze the pools and the results were posted for public scrutiny.

Create 3 high quality educational videos about specific topics on Polkadot.

Reduce the stake for delegating a collator candidate.

If the new amount of staked fund is not large enough, the collator
could be removed from the set of collator candidates and not be
considered for authoring the next blocks.

The unstaked funds are not release immediately to the account, but
they will be available after `StakeDuration` blocks.

The remaining staked funds must still be larger than the minimum
required by this pallet to maintain the status of delegator.

The resulting total amount of funds staked must be within the
allowed range as set in the pallet's configuration.

Emits `DelegatorStakedLess`.

# <weight>
- The transaction's complexity is mainly dependent on updating the
  `SelectedCandidates` storage in `select_top_candidates` which in
  return depends on the number of `MaxSelectedCandidates` (N).
- For each N, we read `CollatorState` from the storage.
---------
Weight: O(N) + O(D) where N is `MaxSelectedCandidates` bounded
by `MaxTopCandidates` and D the number of total delegators for
this collator bounded by `MaxCollatorsPerDelegator`.
- Reads: [Origin Account], DelegatorState, BlockNumber, Unstaking,
  TopCandidates, (N + 1) * CollatorState, MaxSelectedCandidates
- Writes: Unstaking, DelegatorState, CollatorState, Total,
  SelectedCandidates
# </weight>

Referendum #7

No Active Proposals